I hate Gartner.

Send this to your analyst—I dare you.

I’ve seen too many CMOs, too many marketing leaders, and too many folks in the trenches get bent over the boardroom table by what amounts to a cartel of syphilitic charlatans masquerading as research analysts—strangling the entire concept of marketing in the name of objectivity.

I've consoled a 24-year-old—six-foot-four, 250 pounds, brick house of a rugby player—sobbing uncontrollably in the bathroom of a conference because Gartner convinced him he didn’t need a marketing hire yet.

He got his project funded.

He believed them.

He lost everything.

And he was alone.

Fuck. You.


Gartner wraps itself in the language of research—the posturing of intellectual authority, the aesthetics of objectivity.

Whitepapers. Forecasts. Quadrants.

What's actually behind the curtain?

A racket.

Abject bullshit.
An influence machine.
A $5 billion dollar system engineered to exploit insecurity at scale.

Gartner doesn’t exist to illuminate the market.
It exists to control the narrative of the market— in a way that rewards the loudest wallet, the safest idea, and the most risk-averse executive team.

It’s a lighthouse-shaped casino.
And the marketing world keeps buying in.


You’re told Gartner is where smart CMOs go for insight.
That appearing in the Magic Quadrant proves your legitimacy.
That their predictions shape the future of the industry.

You are not told:

  • That Gartner operates over 120 Magic Quadrants, each of which vendors pay to be considered for
  • That analyst access is a line item—available to those who “participate” at the proper financial tier
  • That their “research” frequently uses laughable sample sizes and laughably worse conclusions
  • That their AI forecasts read like a cyberpunk novella dictated by a chatbot on muscle relaxers
  • That behind closed doors, enterprise buyers pass around Gartner reports like memes
    —not because they trust them, but because they’re expected to reference them

You’re not told that being in the quadrant doesn’t mean you’re best-in-class.
It means you paid to get in the room.

You’re not told that early-stage startups burn half their budget trying to buy credibility… only to realize they were buying a seat at the kids' table of a game rigged from the start.

You’re not told that what Gartner really sells isn’t insight—
It’s permission.


This is what marketing has become.

Not a discipline.
Not a craft.
Not even a strategy.

A performance.

A cosplay of credibility, held together by analyst quotes, stale predictions, and a logo buried in a box on page 4 of a quadrant nobody outside your org will ever read.

And if you’re not angry yet—
You’re not paying attention.


Gartner Isn’t an Analyst Firm.

Once you strip away the suit-and-tie optics, the sleek PDFs, the air of executive legitimacy—what you’re left with is a vendor-funded power structure that monetizes fear, confusion, and FOMO.

Because conformity is predictable.
Conformity pays well.
Conformity doesn’t ask hard questions in the analyst briefing.

Here’s how the scam works:

  1. You pay to be evaluated.
    If you're not a client, your chances of being included in a Magic Quadrant are microscopic. But if you are a client, you now have access to briefings, backchannels, and “analyst guidance” on how to present your offering in the most quadrant-friendly way possible.
  2. You follow their roadmap.
    You tailor your positioning to match their criteria. You restructure your product messaging to fit their taxonomy. You burn cycles not on customer feedback—but on analyst appeasement.
  3. You move up the ranks.
    Maybe. If you pay enough, align enough, conform enough. Your logo gets dropped somewhere between “Niche” and “Visionary,” and your CEO screenshots it with a self-congratulatory post about being a "leader" in digital transformation.
  4. You use it as sales collateral.
    Not because it closes deals—but because someone on the buying committee still believes Gartner is the adult in the room.

Spoiler: They’re not.

They’re just the only ones charging you $30,000 for a PowerPoint you’ll pretend to care about, dipshit.


How to Decode the Magic Quadrant

You’ve seen it a thousand times.

Four little boxes, arranged on a grid. Clean lines, vague axes, corporate logos floating like they’ve been anointed by the market gods.

It looks like insight.
It feels like validation.

But what it actually is?
A performance piece.

This is the Quadrant according to Gartner:

Here’s the truth behind each quadrant...

Quadrant What It Claims What It Actually Means
Leaders “Best positioned to succeed in the future.” You paid the most and said what they wanted to hear.
Visionaries “Innovative but not proven.” You made it in, but they’re not sold on you—or your spend.
Challengers “Execution strong, vision weak.” You’re solid, but you didn’t play the analyst game enough.
Niche Players “Specialized, limited impact.” You’re too new, too bold, or too broke for their box.

The Axes Aren’t Real

“Ability to Execute” sounds objective—until you realize it’s built on analyst-defined metrics with opaque weightings.

“Completeness of Vision” is even worse.
It rewards vendors who align their strategy with what Gartner already believes.

So if you’re building something that challenges the status quo?
Tough luck.

You’re not visionary.
You’re inconvenient.

The Placement Isn’t Earned

What determines your dot’s position?

  • Your client status
  • The briefing you paid for
  • The “coaching” you got to tailor your message
  • How well you mapped your roadmap to their taxonomy
  • The relationships your team built with analysts behind the scenes

And the only question that matters is:
Did it help you win customers?


This isn’t a conspiracy theory.

This isn't using Gartner for engagement bait.

This is how the machine is designed to work.

Gartner’s real customers aren’t buyers.
They’re vendors.

They sell influence.
They sell exposure.
They sell the illusion of inevitability—so your CMO can justify a spend, your board can justify the roadmap, and your go-to-market team can point at a quadrant and say, “Look! We’re making progress.”

You’re not.

You’re just better at playing the game.


Now, pair that with the actual “predictions” Gartner publishes.

You’d think they were ghostwritten by a focus group made entirely of TikTok VCs and blackhat SEO operators with a ChatGPT plugin fetish.

Gartner predictions for the future are actual marketing fan fiction— Absolute fucking buffoonery.

Their AI forecasts are incoherent.
Their data sources are laughably small.
Their conclusions are often copy-pasted from outdated vendor decks dressed up in futurist theater.

Here’s a short sample of recent Gartner takes:

  • “By 2025, CMOs will build AI experimentation into their mobile app roadmap”
    → Great. Let’s automate the suck.
  • “By 2026, 30% of budgets will shift to subscription-based social platforms”
    → Fantastic. Let’s place ads behind a paywall on platforms people already hate.
  • “By 2028, organic traffic will drop 50% due to GenAI search”
    → What the fuck is GenAI search? Define it. No really—define it.
    • Because guess what?
    • Chances are, it's the exact bullshit that's going to tell everybody which products are the best... AcCoRdInG tO gArTnEr...
    • iMaGiNe ThAt!

These aren’t insights.
These are provocations engineered to trigger budgetary panic.

Hey, guess what?

It works.


Every time Gartner publishes one of these so-called “forecasts,”
executives across the world adjust roadmaps, reallocate budget, and prep internal decks to stay “ahead of the curve.”

You know what happens next?

  • Teams build tools nobody wants.
  • Campaigns are built around fake market urgency.
  • Product roadmaps are sacrificed to hallucinated demand.

All because an analyst firm sold a future that didn’t exist—
and no one in the room had the nerve to ask if it was real.

Gartner isn’t helping you navigate the future.
They’re shaping it—badly.

With incentives that have nothing to do with your customers and everything to do with their bottom line.

They don’t publish truth. Hell, they don't publish anything remotely useable.

They publish obedience.

And if you think that’s too harsh, you haven’t seen what comes next.


The Perspective Shift: Why This Isn’t Just a Scam—It’s a Systemic Disease

Let’s stop pretending this is about a single report, or one bad forecast, or even just a bloated analyst firm milking desperate vendors.

This is about what Gartner represents.

It’s the final form of everything broken in B2B marketing:

  • The worship of appearance over reality
  • The addiction to external validation
  • The obsession with optics instead of outcomes
  • The institutional fear of thinking for yourself

Because that’s what Gartner actually sells.

Not insight.
Not clarity.
Permission.

Permission to do the thing you were too scared to do without a “trusted” third party telling you it was okay.

You weren’t going to invest in that tech until Gartner said it was a leader.
You weren’t going to bet on that strategy until it was in a whitepaper.
You weren’t going to back your team’s creative idea until an analyst nodded in your general direction.

Gartner doesn’t tell you what to do. It gives you cover when you don’t know what the hell you’re doing.

And marketing, as a function, has been built around this co-dependent dance for decades.


Now let’s talk about the actual damage:

Budgets get torched.

Marketing leaders burn tens—sometimes hundreds—of thousands of dollars trying to chase “credibility.” Analyst briefings, “engagements,” quadrant fees, branded distribution. It’s not strategy—it’s PR for people who still believe in gatekeepers.

Strategy gets warped.

Instead of solving real buyer problems or differentiating in the market, teams build toward Gartner’s roadmap. They optimize for quadrant visibility instead of customer outcomes. They sacrifice originality to fit into analyst-approved boxes. And then they wonder why nothing resonates.

Executives get high on their own supply.

CEOs see a dot moving in a quadrant and think it’s progress. Boards see a branded badge and think it’s traction. But nobody asks the only question that matters: Did this actually help us win real customers?

Marketers lose their fucking soul.*

Bright, capable teams get reduced to analyst wranglers and narrative police. They spend more time prepping decks for briefings than building actual demand. They become curators of perception—not creators of value.

And you know what the most insane part of all of this is?

Most of them know it.

They just don’t feel like they have a choice.


Because here’s the deepest layer of the rot:

Gartner thrives in environments where no one wants to take real responsibility.

When leadership is scared.
When the market is confusing.
When pressure is high and vision is low—

Gartner becomes the safety net.
A prestige-shaped placebo.

It looks like rigor.
It feels like insurance.
It smells like legitimacy.

But it’s none of those things.

It’s a $5 billion hall of mirrors, built to make you feel safe while you waste your budget performing legitimacy...

...for an audience that doesn’t give a shit.

They’re not reading quadrants.

They’re watching how you show up.
How you speak.
How you solve their actual problems.
How real you are in a sea of vendor cosplay.

And you know what happens when you put a Gartner badge at the center of your marketing story?

You’re telling everybody on the planet exactly who you are.

You’re saying,

We don’t know how to earn your trust—so we paid someone else to rent it.

CTA Image

You know this isn’t just an article.
If you felt the shift—don’t just read.

Join Burn It Down.

Free subscribers get the next drop before it hits LinkedIn.
Paid members get the stuff that never will.

Subscribe

Burn the Boss.

Reclaim the Game.

If you’ve made it this far, you already know the truth.

Gartner isn’t a necessary evil.
It’s just evil dressed in necessity.

A machine that feeds on executive fear.
A system that punishes original thought.
A marketing cartel with better fonts and worse ideas.

It doesn’t illuminate anything.
It doesn’t reward the best.
It doesn’t care about your buyers.

It cares about maintaining the illusion that it still matters.

And it does that the only way broken systems know how:

By making you feel like the crazy one for questioning it.

What if we just stopped caring about the quadrant?
What if we pulled that budget and gave it to the content team building actual trust?
What if we spent those analyst fees on real research, real creative, real market traction?

You already know the answer.

You’d lose nothing.
You’d gain everything.
And the only thing that would die… is the delusion.


Gartner has become the final boss of marketing dysfunction.

A monument to fake rigor.
A shrine to pay-to-play legitimacy.
The last defense of people who haven’t had a new idea in a decade.

So here’s the plan:

Burn it.

Burn the quadrants.
Burn the “research.”
Burn the budget line.

Free your team from the pressure to perform credibility.
Rebuild your strategy on truth, not theater.
Stop asking permission from an institution that’s never had your best interest in mind.

The future of marketing doesn’t need Gartner.

It needs you.

Because if there’s one thing every marketer deserves—
every creative, every strategist, every brand trying to do it right

It’s this:

Every marketer deserves the freedom to build something real, without having to pay a goddamn toll just to be taken seriously.

Let’s be real—
You already copied that quote.
You’re about to send it to your group chat.
And now you've screenshotted this too.
You might as well fund the cause.

Yes, I know it's the best CTA you're ever seen.
The link has been copied!